A New Must-Read Case on Quasi-Judicial Proceedings

Last week the N.C. Court of Appeals published yet another opinion (PHG v. City of Asheville) that (1) further defines the template for deciding quasi-judicial zoning applications and (2) curtails the all-too-frequent seduction of board members to slip into legislative shoes while wearing a (quasi) judicial robe. Full disclosure: I argued PHG to the Court […]

A New Game Changer Zoning Case

I published this post last January but my law partners – who won the case – asked me to take it down. Why? Because the other parties asked the N.C. Supreme Court to review the decision and one of the bases for higher review is a case’s significance. And since I had described this decision as one […]

Case Law Update – Solar Farms (Again), the Prima Facie Case (Again), and Other Fun Facts (Again)

Yet another Court of Appeals case, Ecoplexus v. Currituck County, examined the denial of a solar farm and applied the same principles as in Dellinger v. Lincoln County and Innovative 55 v. Robeson County, but with some interesting twists. Facts Ecoplexus arises from Currituck County, a county that is now widely known as, well, I’ll […]

Case Law Update – When a Zoning Board’s Decision Becomes Binding Legal Precedent

A recent N.C. Court of Appeals decision expanded upon and clarified when a prior quasi-judicial decision is binding on future boards. Disclosure: It was my privilege to have served as co-counsel at the board level and as lead litigation counsel for the petitioners in this case. While I don’t believe the commentary below exhibits bias, […]

Case Law Update – When It Helps to Read the Statute

Quasi-judicial proceedings are quite common in land use decisions.  They are proceedings where the local board loosely follows the rules of the courtroom in order to determine if the applicant has presented sufficient evidence on which the board can make the necessary findings to issue a variance or a special use permit or to overturn […]

Morrisville Tower Case Revisited

            Law is not unlike archery.  You can hit the bullseye, the third ring, or miss the target altogether.  In my recent post on the Morrisville cell tower case (American Tower v. Town of Morrisville) I thought I had hit the bullseye.              Subsequently, comments from and discussion with members of the land use bar […]

Case Law Update – Cell Towers, SUPs and Impossible Standards

            A recent Court of Appeals opinion, American Towers v. Town of Morrisville, simultaneously provides a good road map for interpreting evidence in quasi-judicial proceedings, shows how utterly maddening it can be to practice before local government boards, and illustrates how difficult-to-meet standards can be made impossible-to-meet when interpreted by boards and courts.              Before […]

Case Law Update – “What Ifs” Are Not Evidence

              A recent unpublished Court of Appeals opinion – which I think should have been published – illustrates a common evidentiary issue in quasi-judicial proceedings and discusses a not-so-common procedural issue related to appeals from local zoning boards.  It’s the latter, procedural issue for which publication might have been merited.                  Sidebar: Court of […]

Board of Adjustment Subpoenas – What are They and How do They Work??

            American counties and towns are peppered with an unusual governmental creature called the “Board of Adjustment.”  BOA functions may vary state to state, but they are the focal point for some of the most far-reaching land use decisions made by local governments.              In North Carolina, Boards of Adjustment can issue subpoenas much the […]

Zoning Appeals and Statutes of Limitation

             If you’ve ever wondered what frightens lawyers and keeps them up at night I can describe it in three words: statutes of limitations.              A “statute of limitation” is a fancy way of describing a deadline to file a lawsuit.  That’s all it is.  The problems with these deadlines are that 1) they sometimes […]

About Our Firm

Fox Rothschild LLP is a national law firm with 900 attorneys practicing in 27 offices coast to coast. We’ve been serving clients for more than a century, and we’ve been climbing the ranks of the nation’s largest firms for many years, according to both The Am Law 100 and The National Law Journal.
Read More